Annotated Bibliography Week #10
Annotated Bibliography Week #10
Article #1
Texture
analysis of GPR data as a tool for depicting soil mineralogy. (2011). 2011 IEEE
Applied Imagery
Pattern Recognition
Workshop (AIPR), https://doi-org.byui.idm.oclc.org/10.1109/AIPR.2011.6176377
This study developed a code that can be added to current analysis
measures that help to see the distinction between minerals. Their codes helped to differentiate between mineral
samples using several characteristics. Some
of the key characteristics that they were able to use were moisture content,
high contrast, and correlation. They
found the use in tandem with current modes of analysis the code helped to identify
the 2 minerals studied. The results
looked promising and further testing encouraged.
Article #2
Yen, A. S., Gellert, R., Schroder, C., Morris, R. V., Bell III,
J. F., Knudson, A. T., Clark, B. C., Ming, D. W.,
Crisp, J. A., Arvidson, R. E., Blaney, D.,
Bruckner, J., Christensen, P. R., DesMariais, D. J., De Souza Jr., P. A., Economou,
T. E., Ghosh, A., Hahn, B.C.,
Herkenhoff, K. E., Haskin, L.A.,
(2005). An Integrated view of the
chemistry and minerology of martian soils.
Nature, 436(7047), 49-54. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03637
This was just plain fun to find.
They were able to identify indicators of chemical and physical
weathering processes from the soil samples taken from Mars. They found soil
deposits at both sites to contain similar basaltic mineralogies. They
found olivine and resolved that there were limited amounts of water
alterations. They also found nickel
residue which could be meteor residue. Mars
had some recognizable minerals in their dust composition. They had pyroxene, plagioclase feldspar, and olivine
in larger amounts. It was neat to read
about rocks on a different planet.
Comments
Post a Comment